AI
offers incredible progress but threatens
humanity with unpredictable
risks; if AI is here to stay, we must regulate its powerful technology
before it gets out of control.
► Words
in purple
that turn green - click
for
instant vocabulary explanation
AI has become part of our daily life everywhere, in a very
short space of time. ChatGPT was started in February
2023. Now, it and other AI applications are used by millions of people
every day. And AI is useful... there can
be no doubt about that. To a certain point, it has replaced conventional
searches on
the internet because it provides complete answers. It is used in homes
and businesses, in government, and by the military. It helps designers,
teachers, students, economists, and even doctors.
But can it last? Will it last? Or even, should it last? Is it the magic key
guiding us to a wonderful future? Or could
it be taking us unable to see into
the
unknown?
The Promise of AI
The people driving the AI revolution say that it will lead the human race to a
bright future, where there are answers to every question and solutions
to every problem. AI is driving huge, very big
progress in
medical research and in military technology. But some people are
worried about the risks. They argue that we must
not trust this technology blindly, even if it brings great benefits.
The Limits of Technology
The problem with AI is that it is artificial,
not human. It is built using human knowledge, but it does not have the
natural natural reactions
that
humans
have. Just like humans, AI can, and does,
make mistakes. The popular AI platforms accept this, and most of them
carry a notice that says: "Please note that AI can
make mistakes."
AI has a tendency to amplify problems and increase
enthusiasm.
AI chatbots and the AI algorithms used by social media are blamed for
creating problems of addiction in
young
people. Too often, they tell people what they want to hear, not what
they need to hear – and
the
two may be very different. Because of this, developers ought to design these systems more
responsibly to protect young minds.
A Modern Frankenstein?
But these examples are small
problems compared to the big risk that some experts are warning about:
AI may get out of control.
Two hundred years ago, a young lady called Mary Shelley wrote
a book that has become a well-known of
English
literature: Frankenstein. In the story, a young scientist called Victor
Frankenstein created an artificial human, known as "the living being." We could call him AH. At first, AH is
really useful, but finally, he
becomes
more powerful than the man who had created him. AH kills Victor's young
lady just married
, and then his father. In the end, Victor dies while trying to
stop his AH from doing any more damage.
Many experts warn that the same may
happen with AI. At first, AI learned from human knowledge; but already,
it is having to learn from
made by AI
knowledge.
If the knowledge is correct, there is no problem. But when AI begins to
learn from bad data, the new data it creates will
be even worse. The consequences could
be unimaginable, and AI models might
completely break down. Experts call this "model collapse."
Facing the Future
Therefore, we have to
ask ourselves this very important
question:
how can we avoid Victor
Frankenstein’s mistake? Many experts say that governments and
scientists should work
together immediately to create strict global rules. We must control the development of AI
before it becomes too powerful to control.
In the end, AI does not have to
become a monster, and we ought to
remember that the creator is always responsible for the creation.
WORD
GUIDE threaten: be a danger for - unpredictable:
unimaginable launched: started
- traditional: conventional - open sesame: magic
key - blindfolded: unable to see -
massive: huge - artificial: man-made -
reflexes: natural reactions - amplify: increase
- dependency: addiction - minor: small
- classic: well-known - creature: living
being - eventually: finally -
AI-generated: AI-made - collapse: break
down - critical: very important, crucial -
manage: control
Copying
permitted for personal study, or by teachers for use with their
students
Student
Worksheet
AI: here to stay?
Interactive
- use on screen or on paper: 1. Complete this extract
from the original text, choosing the correct word from the three
options suggested in each case.
Many experts warn that the
happen with AI. At first, AI learned
human knowledge; but already, it is
learn from AI-generated knowledge. If the knowledge
correct, there is no problem. But
AI begins to learn from bad data, the new data it creates
be
. The consequences
be unimaginable, and AI models
completely collapse.
Therefore, we
ourselves this critical question: how
we
Victor Frankenstein’s mistake? Many experts say
governments and scientists
work
immediately to create strict global rules. We
control the development of AI
it becomes too powerful to manage. In the end, AI does not
become a monster, and we
remember that the creator is
responsible for the creation.
Grammar exercise: the functions of -ING
Complete this exercise by identifying the exact grammatical category
for each -ing word used in the text,
using the standard Linguapress
definitions.
1. Or could it be taking us blindfolded
into the unknown?
2. Is it the magic key guiding us to a
wonderful future?
3. The people driving the AI revolution
say that it will lead the human race...
4. AI is driving massive progress in
medical research.
5. AI chatbots and algorithms are blamed for creating
problems of dependency in young people.
For
teachers:
Language points:
Grammar - Modal verbs
This article illustrates the
full range of key English modal verbs
in a natural,
argumentative context, using modals to express probability,
advice, necessity, and
prohibition. Here is a breakdown of how they function in
the text: 1. Ability & Certainty vs.
Possibility Can
& Could: The text uses can
for a proven, general ability ("AI
can, and does, make mistakes"). It shifts to could
to express a theoretical or
hypothetical future risk ("could
it be taking us..." / "...consequences could be unimaginable"). May
& Might: These are used to show real future
possibilities where the outcome is uncertain (may)
or hypothetical (might)
("AI may get out of control"
/ "the same may happen"
/ "models might
completely collapse"). Will:
Expresses strong prediction or future certainty from the perspective of
tech drivers ("it will
lead the human race..." / "data it creates will be even worse").
2. Obligation, Necessity &
Prohibition Must /
Must not: Used for an urgent, absolute necessity or an
outright prohibition ("we
must control..." / "we must not trust..."). Have to
/ Has to: Functions similarly to must,
but often highlights external necessity or logical requirements ("we
have to ask ourselves..." /
"it is having to learn..."). Does not
have to: Crucially shows the absence of obligation/necessity
("AI does not have to
become a monster"), meaning a bad outcome is optional, not
guaranteed.
3. Advice & Moral Duty Should
& Ought to: These two modals are used
interchangeably in the text to offer strong recommendations or point
out moral duties ("developers
ought to design..." / "governments should work together").
They suggest the best course of action without being as aggressive as must.
4. Direct Questioning Should
is also effectively used in the introduction to challenge the ethics of
the situation ("Or even,
should it last?"), forcing the reader to think about
permission and wisdom rather than just technological capability. (See Descriptive
Grammar of English §1.15.2.)
Oral warm up exercise...
Before taking the article in class, ask your students a
few questions
about AI. What is it? Is it good? Do they use it themselves?
If so how? etc. This could lead to some lively discussion.
Written exercise: writing
an abstract.
Ask students to write an abstract (résumé, précis) of this 600 word
article in about a quarter of its length. This is something to be done
on paper, in the classroom. Otherwise, all switched-on students will
simply ask AI to do the job for them.... which is one of its popular
uses among the student population!
Interactive gap-fill
exercise above.
This exercise can be taken in many different ways. One good way, if
your classroom is suitably equipped, is to project the exercise onto
the whiteboard and ask students to write down the answers in order on a
sheet of paper. Then, one by one, click on the options so that pupils
can correct or change their answers. Finally explain the right answers
which are in the original text.
This exercise is best done if you make sure that students can no longer
see the original text.
Some teachers however may simply ask pupils to refer back to the
original text to find the right answers.
The different gaps to fill cover a variety of aspects of English. As
well as modal verbs, they cover vocabulary and structures.
Going further –
For some general tips on the nature of technical language, and discover
more graded Englih texts on technical topics, see Technical English
Other ideas?
EFL teachers: Help develop this resource by contributing extra teaching
materials or exercises. To contribute click here
for further
details
Photo top: adapted from a work by Hobim
Other photos Linguapress
Multi-copying of this resource is permitted for classroom use.
Free to view, free to
share, free
to use
in class, free to print, but not free to copy..
If
you like this page and want to share it with others, just
share a link, don't copy.